I haven't written on here for a long time.   After November I had to take a break and hope for the best.  Apparently November meant nothing.  The GOP doesn't have the balls or the votes to make any real change.  And if they did, it seems they don't have the will.

  To the Illegal War.  I was hoping to just grab attention with that title.

  The many false faces of Obama and the Democrats has been on display more blatantly than ever recently yet the naive public still doesn't seem to care.   What at first appears to be hypocrisy on Obama's part when it comes to Libya and Egypt really isn't hypocrisy at all!   Of course the way he speaks on the State Run Media, you'd think that he is doing the exact thing President Bush did, which would make him a hypocrite. 

  But that is just the carefully played out distraction, of the likes planned by the KGB for years and years.  It's the old "Is that a rabbit over there?" question to get everyone to look one way while the dirty deal goes on someplace else.

  The easy thing is to complain that Obama and the Democrats are doing the same things that Bush did in Iraq and Afghanistan, while trying to spin it at something entirely different.   It is different, just not the way the State Run Media would have everyone believe.

  The uprising in Egypt was NOT brought about by a bunch of poor little Egyptians who wanted democracy.  It was a hostile takeover by the Muslim brotherhood, who were trained by Iran.  The group consisted of all sorts of unsavory characters, the vast majority of whom are terrorists.  The Egyptian military, in keeping with it's training (learned from us) did not attack it's own people.  Such was the no-win situation for Hosni Mubarack.

   Egypt had been one of our strongest allies in the middle east for years.  This is all DONE and OVER.  You can expect an Iranian style Islamic terrorist state.  You can also expect that the Egyptian military, is currently being purged of anyone who doesn't have the stomach to kill fellow countrymen who refuse to support and defend an Islamic state.

  In Libya, the military such as it was, was controlled by someone who's butter slipped off the noodle years ago. Qhaddafi or however it's spelled this hour, was not exactly the sharpest tool in the nation leading shed.  His military for the most part, was not indoctrinated with the Western style or Posse Comatatus Act ideals of not firing on civilians.  Many of the more educated, such as pilots did however fly their planes to Malta and refuse to attack.   We may never know how many others refused to follow orders and were executed.   The rebels, just like in Egypt are not peace loving citizens who just want democracy!  No more than they were in Egypt.  Supposedly some of the Army officers, who refused to attack civilians joined and organized the rebels.   But as in Egypt if appears that this uprising is also being driven by the Muslim Brotherhood and has among their ranks those who were formerly held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. 

 Obama has tried to keep up the illusion that he is a Christian.  But every day he demonstrates he leans as a Muslim, and everything he is doing is to bring about the same sort of violence in the United States that has happend in Libya and Egypt.  He and his cohorts like Van Jones, etc want a revolution that results in the American Government as we know it being toppled, and replaced by an Islamic State.

  Contrast Egypt and Libya with Iran.  Obama didn't get his pals in the UN to do a no-fly zone over Iran to prevent a "massacre".   Because he sides with the Iranian Regime in all respects.  He might talk tough to Iran for the fools in the State Run Media, and those in Congress, but that is only to keep the Democrats blindly, naively, thinking he's with them.

  While Egypt was relatively quick and neat by terrorist standards, Libya wasn't.  Libya wasn't hamstrung by Western influences.  If Qhaddafi had been allowed to continue to do what he wanted to do, that Islamic revolution might have failed.   Obama and the other infilitrators at the UN could not let this happen.  So Obama pretended to waffle around publicly, while bypassing his own cabinet, and making secret arrangements in the background with his terrorist pals in the UN.  He gets the UN to take the lead and push the whole no-fly zone idea.  Then acts like he is just going along with the plan.

  Of course the State Run Media totally ignored the guidance of the U.S. Military that enforcing the no-fly zone is more complicated than just announcing to Qhaddaffi that he should keep his planes grounded.    That it would require strategic strikes on air defense sites, which will be manned by members of the Libyan military.  And they will die.   Then there is the problem with the un-organized and uncaring rebels accidentally shooting down our planes.  Or perhaps that mobile anti-aircraft weapons might be placed in civilian areas which would result in the very deaths that the storyline says we are trying to prevent.  Obama could ignore all this advice because he never planned to limit himself to a mere no-fly zone.

  Obama and his pals at the UN, who are really running the United States knew all along that they were going to do more than just enforce a no-fly zone.  They just figured that term was well known ever since the Bush days and people would blindly go along with it.  It was a good calculation because it has worked.  You don't see Code Pink, or other war protesters flocking to Washington to demand an end to the "ILLEGAL WAR" like they did for Bush. 

  For a little added distraction the State Run Media made a big deal about the name chosen for the operation.  Just some more smoke and mirrors to make the dimmer bulbs go off arguing about that while ignoring that we've murdered people in Libya.  The brighter people hear the no-fly zone discussion and immediately think, well what good will that do for mobile artillery and tanks?

  Which brings up the next problem.  The U.S, and NATO is at this moment killing Libyan soldiers by the truckload.  Because tanks, artillery, etc are being targeted and destroyed.  There are images of dead Libyan soldiers killed by our cruise missiles and NATO munitions.  If you want to watch some video of it, go to Liveleak.org.  You won't see it on the State Run Media because that just ruins the whole image Obama and the UN want to portray.

  Obama is extremely consistent. He is a muslim, and he is doing everything he can to support our enemies and prop up islamic revolutions everywhere he can.   He just calls it something else and that is good enough for the Democrats and the media.

  Last night Obama gave his "for public consumption only" speech assuring everyone that the whole mess was being turned over to NATO.  Again this was to keep the dim bulb Congress thinking everything is just peachy.  And by this morning the story had all changed, the NATO handover had been delayed.   But worse than that, the U.S. Ambassador to the UN is indicating the Obama wants to arm the so-called rebels in Libya.

  You see how he keeps playing everyone?  Keeps shifting the target.  Calculating that the dim bulbs in congress won't act to stop him.  And apparently they won't. 

  The end result?  The U.S. could put weapons in the hands of terrorists,  ie. the Muslim brotherhood, Al Quida, etc.  As if the reports that they've gotten their hands on weapons caches from the Libyan Armories wasn't bad enough news! 

  And exactly what kind of weapons would we give them?  From the videos I've seen, I think they have all the small arms they'll ever need in the form of AK-47's, and ancient anti-aircraft guns.   From a military point of view, if Qhaddafi's forces are pulling back toward some city for a last stand, it will most likely be in a heavily populated area.  The defense will be with tanks, and other armored vehicles which may be difficult to target from the air without killing civilians.   So if Obama doesn't order our aircraft to attack, then the weapons they'd have to give the rebels would have to be heavy weapons if they wanted to take out a strong defense.

 The bottom line is that Obama has picked and chosen which Islamic revolutions he wants to support.  And he has forced our military to participate on the side of the decidedly bad guys.  He has chosen to ignore true democracy movements such as in Iran and has stood blindly by while civilians in Iran were murdered.

  He has gotten us into a situation in Libya, with NO approval from the Congress, to kill Libyan soldiers.

  Envision Impeachment!

 Recently I put my name to one of those "calls to action" regarding the repeal of Obamacare.  I was more than eager to do this and it was sent to my Congressmen, Senators Brown (D), Portman (R), and Representative Latta (R).

 The only reply I got was from Sherrod Brown (D).  I'll paste it here for your enjoyment.   Well, Ok.. mostly MY enjoyment because you KNOW I won't be able to resist making comments (in red) at every step of the way.  Hey, might as well right?  While we still have some remaining freedom of speech.

(the reply)

"Dear (my name):

Thank you for sharing your views about repealing the new health reform law.  (Translation: Really? You think I'm going to e-mail you back?  I couldn't care less what you think!  Some office poque that drew the short straw wrote this reply! Honestly.. when I want any crap out of you I'll squeeze your head!) 

I do not support repealing the Affordable Care Act.  (Because Master Obama has ordered me to support it.)  This legislation has already reduced prescription drug costs for seniors (lie), enabled families to continue to insure their dependents as they complete school and look for jobs (a necessity because the socialists ie. democrats have utterly destroyed the economy and the job market.  The dependents, ie. college students are being brainwashed that you can get something for nothing and leech off of mommy and daddy forever.  If insurance companies could have afforded this they would have done it.  Of course that is the plan, kill private insurance and trap everyone in a nationalized health care system which will result in rationing, death panels, etc., just as it has in Canada and the U.K.  Even the U.K. just announced they are going to have to revamp their system because it is failing.), enabled individuals with pre-existing conditions to find affordable coverage (possibly the only piece of truth in this reply.  Although eventually private insurance will collapse because they will not be able to compete with Government run Insurance where books are never required to be balanced, debt ceilings can be raised, more funny money printed, etc., until the entire program collapses.), and helped reduce the cost of employer-sponsored retiree coverage.   (If this is true why are there already over 200 exemptions being handed out, the majority of which are Union employers?  Well .. because this was another part of the lie all along.  This was a plan to dump tax dollars into failing UAW, SEIU, and State union retirement plans which are all failing because they are not based on sound business models.   They are based in fantasy, politics, and greed.)

I am concerned that misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric have left Americans without a clear picture of the health reform bill.  (The misinformation is on the part of the Department of HHS, Obama, and the democrats.  The misinformation is being propagated by Google sponsored search results that are bought and paid for by my tax dollars.  Search results which point you first to HHS's collection of smoke and mirrors.  Besides, how would Sherrod Brown know if there was misinformation?  He's part of the party that felt it necessary to create a 2,000 page bill, and then brag that there was no reason to read it!  There is a VERY clear picture of Obamacare for those who took the time to read it.   Pointing out it's evil, destructive, flaws does not constitute inflammatory rhetoric, it's just the truth, and apparently it hurts.) It is intended to increase price competition in the health insurance market (What private insurance company can compete against government run insurance when the former is expected to operate at a loss while the latter just prints funny money to balance the books?) ; expand access to health coverage (many forms of insurance have already been wiped out due to Obamacare)-- in part so that insured individuals do not have to bear the cost of the care provided to uninsured Americans; (Really? It's all going to be taken from our paychecks in taxes anyway so we'll be paying for it in the end.  And when we are taxed to into the stone ages and it still doesn't work, the rationing will begin.  Only for Americans there will be no border to cross to get that operation a loved one needs.  Sherrod Brown really is incapable of thinking the whole thing through!) make preventive care affordable to reduce the incidence and cost of serious disease in this country; (preventative care here means the government will dictate what, when, where you eat and in the end refuse to treat you if you don't comply.) reduce deadly and costly medical errors (How do 2000 pages of paperwork prevent an error?  This is back to Obama's assertion that doctors perform dangerous and uneccessary surgeries just to make money.  So the answer is, some politician will decide instead of you and your doctor what medical procedures you'll be allowed to have.  And any doctor that goes rogue and tries to do it anway will be punished.) ; and address other challenges that have compromised the full potential of our nation’s extraordinary health care system.  (Our extraordinary Health Care system is just that, extraordinary to the point that people from Canada come here for life saving medical care.  Obamacare will destroy it and reduce it to the same inefficient, failing, systems that Canada and the U.K. have. )

I have heard from Ohioans who share your opposition to health reform (Not oppostition to health reform, opposition to Socialist Obamacare) and from those who believe it is critical to the future stability of our health system.  (But even though the numbers who oppose it are higher than those who want to keep it you'll continue to ignore the will of the majority, because you are a socialist first, American second.) While you and I disagree on the merits of the Affordable Care Act, I truly appreciate that you and other Ohioans have taken the time to share your views with me.  (See my real thoughts from the first line.)

                         Sincerely,

                         Sherrod Brown

                         United States Senator

 It's another sad day for America.  The traitors in Congress have repealed DADT.

 The anti-American Obama supporters on the left claim that this is a victory for Civil Rights.   Of course, it isn't. 

  On the shallow end of the deep pool of concerns over this is that essentially  the 9% "gay tail" is wagging the 91% "staight dog" of the country.  The only way this could happen of course is that Obama, Reid, and Pelosi, apparently all gay themselves.. are in charge and have abused their power to get it done.  Only 9% of the population is gay, yet they are getting 100% of the attention. 

  Then there is the self-acclaimed "civil right" aspect.  Last I checked there is no specific "right" spelled out in the constitution to be gay.  But more specifically,  there is no right to demand that everyone else recognize this made-up right, and require them to alter their beliefs to accomodate it.

  In fact a right Americans DO have specifically spelled out is "Freedom OF Religion".  Of course Obama has recently argued against this concept proving and reaffirming once again that he hates this country as founded, hates the constitution, and it's founding principles.  And this is one of the key reasons for repealling DADT.  It unhinges one more link to Christianity.   They have basically legalized descrimination and persecution against Christians in the military.

  After all, if you are a Christian and you are serving in the military, you will now be forced by the Federal Government to alter your beliefs or be expelled from the military.  Some examples:

  1.  You don't have the choice in many cases to not shower in a communal shower facility such as a shower tent when deployed.   As it is now, you can be fairly assured that there aren't any gay soldiers checking you out as you shower.   But now, you will essentially be entertainment for those gay soldiers who have purposely sought out the military for these types of situations.   It is no different conceptually if a female soldier was required to shower with the men, while being assured that "we're all professionals here, nobody is looking at you in a sexual manner".   If, as a military person, you find yourself in this situation, you could complain that private "so and so" was "gazing" in the shower.   What will happen now?  Your "civil rights" will be institutionally violated, and you will effectively be told shut up.   What about YOUR rights then?  Well  they simply won't matter.

  2.  Housing will become an issue.  I recall a duty station where a certain individual was noticed to always have a camera with him in the bathroom.   We realized at some point that he was taking pictures of us as we showered.   This was reported to the chain of command, thankfully before this person was beaten to within an inch of their lives.  It created a huge problem because nobody wanted to have him as a room-mate.  So while the rest of us were crammed into barracks rooms 2-4 in a room (depending on rank), this gay person got a room to himself.    They were required to ignore orders regarding rank and birthing space because of one person.   They had to force more people into several rooms to clear space for this gay person.   What about the rights of those who forced to be crammed into other rooms?  Well they just didn't matter.   Project this to other situations such as deployed birthing, where you may be unclothed at times.  The Federal Government wants you to expose yourself to those who may be attracted to you sexually. 

 3.  First Aid:  Everyone in the military is tested for AIDS because lets face it, combat is bloody.  Currently you can be fairly certain that those around you are not HIV positive.  Even as it is, there was a man who contracted AIDS while in the phillipines and eventually died.  There was a stressing situation where the command was trying to protect his privacy while protecting others without them knowing the situation.  He was relegated to working at night, while others worked normal shifts.  In war, you don't have the luxury of picking schedules around a single individual.   Imagine if this unit was attacked and blood products of the HIV positive person are spread over a large area.  What about the rights of the straight people to not be exposed to those possibly HIV positive that have not yet tested so?  Well they just don't matter to Obama.  He'd never served a day in the military and his goal is to destroy it and replace it.

 4.  Miscellaneous Rules and Regs:  Where do the special considerations stop?  Uniform regulations have already been challenged by gang-bangers who managed to get into the military and have decided that tatoos, Bling, sagging, etc. is their "civil right" and that they shouldn't be required to follow them.  At the time I retired, they had been soundly slapped back as they should have been.  Everyone follows the uniform regulations, period.  You can bet this will be challenged again.   They gays will follow their gang-bang brothers and demand they should be allowed to wear their hair differently, uniforms differently, march differently, etc.

 The military has been configured as it was through years of hard learned lessons.  Discipline was required, to ensure maximum effectiveness and survivability.   Now instead of the branches of service deciding what is best, traitors in Washington, who've never served a day, are forcing their deepest, darkest desires upon them.  

 It is pathetic.  But what can we expect from a pathetic excuse for a Commander in Chief, and a group of Socialists in  Congress?